Re: Performance features the 4th

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance features the 4th
Date: 2003-11-07 16:41:32
Message-ID: 29601.1068223292@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> However, I have not seen much evidence yet that the vacuum delay alone
> does that much.

Gaetano and a couple of other people did experiments that seemed to show
it was useful. I think we'd want to change the shape of the knob per
later suggestions (sleep 10 ms every N blocks, instead of N ms every
block) but it did seem that there was useful bang for little buck there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-07 16:49:22 Re: PHB?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-07 16:36:55 Re: Experimental ARC implementation