Re: automatically generating node support functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date: 2022-02-14 23:32:21
Message-ID: 2960078.1644881541@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I do however not think it's a good idea to commit something generating
> something like the existing node functions vs going for a metadata based
> approach at dealing with node functions. That aspect of my patchset is
> independent of the libclang vs script debate.

I think that finishing out and committing this patch is a fine step
on the way to that. Either that, or you should go ahead and merge
your backend work onto what Peter's done ... but that seems like
it'll be bigger and harder to review.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message r.takahashi_2@fujitsu.com 2022-02-14 23:52:58 RE: Support escape sequence for cluster_name in postgres_fdw.application_name
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-14 23:23:48 Re: automatically generating node support functions