Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857
Date: 1999-10-28 22:58:12
Message-ID: 29576.941151492@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Oh, I defined it in that file, it's used in psql. Unfortunately, it seems
> to be used internally in readline as well. In now figured out that this
> causes problems only with static linking, but not dynamic. I'm no expert
> on linking, does anyone have an idea or do I have to make up a different
> name?

Pick another name --- you're just *asking* for trouble with that one.
People tend to invent macros with names like that...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-28 23:05:56 Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd)
Previous Message Brian Ristuccia 1999-10-28 20:35:53 Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd)