Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad
>> everywhere? Should we be rethinking the default preference order?
> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree?
What's that got to do with it?
regards, tom lane