Re: [Fwd: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql 6.5-1 rpms on RedHat 6.0]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, jbj(at)redhat(dot)com, lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql 6.5-1 rpms on RedHat 6.0]
Date: 1999-07-08 17:05:02
Message-ID: 29569.931453502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Ah, this is the Right Thing to do. So, the SRPM spec file should not be
> kludged to work around them for the 6.5.1 release -- but, to build 6.5
> from pristine sources (RedHat policy), the "%undefine _fixgroup" hack
> should be retained, to build under rpm 3.0.2, unless a patch that
> removes those files is packaged with the 6.5 SRPM/RPMS.

There are several other bugfixes over 6.5 in the RPM already, so I
see no good reason not to just remove those four symlinks; it certainly
seems cleaner than kluging the RPM script...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-07-08 17:07:32 Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-07-08 16:42:09 Postgresql 6.5.1 and alpha -- a question from RedHat