| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta) |
| Date: | 2006-09-18 16:15:51 |
| Message-ID: | 29546.1158596151@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> They also talk about a "guaranteed differentness" - and as much as I
> understand, they are Unique as long as the MAC-Adresses of the Network-Cards
> are unique, and fall back to "extremly likely" when there is no network card
> present.
MAC addresses are not guaranteed unique (heck, on Apple machines they're
user-assignable, and I think you can change 'em on Linux too). Another
unrelated-to-reality assumption in the above claim is that the local
system clock is always accurate (is never, say, set backwards).
You can have a reasonably strong probability that UUIDs generated per spec
within a single well-run network are unique, but that's about as far as
I'd care to believe it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pascal Meunier | 2006-09-18 16:20:19 | Re: minor feature request: Secure defaults during |
| Previous Message | mark | 2006-09-18 16:14:17 | Re: UUID/GUID discussion leading to request for hexstring bytea? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mark | 2006-09-18 16:23:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch for UUID datatype (beta) |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-18 15:53:54 | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta) |