Re: advisory locks and permissions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: advisory locks and permissions
Date: 2006-09-22 15:37:05
Message-ID: 29532.1158939425@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> advisory locks still show up as 'userlock' in the pg_locks view. does
> this matter?

I'm disinclined to change that, because it would probably break existing
client-side code for little gain.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-22 15:59:46 Re: advisory locks and permissions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-09-22 15:33:09 Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2