Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-08 15:38:42
Message-ID: 29532.1055086722@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> "wal_debug" is seldom used outside of Postgresql source development or unusual
> system failures, and should therefore go last.

BTW, it occurs to me that wal_debug is one of the hacker-only variables
that probably ought not be documented at all. I cannot imagine any use
for it for the average DBA.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-08 16:36:48 neptune back up and being configured ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-08 13:33:03 Re: cvs ETA?