From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Index creation time and distribution |
Date: | 2008-05-22 13:14:36 |
Message-ID: | 29529.1211462076@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I experienced this morning a performance problem when we imported a
> dump in a 8.1 database.
> The table is 5 millions rows large and when the dump creates an index
> on a specific text column called clazz it takes 27 minutes while on
> the other columns, it only takes a couple of seconds:
> The only weird thing about this column is that 4.7 millions of rows
> have the exact same value.
Do you have maintenance_work_mem set large enough that the index
creation sort is done in-memory? 8.1 depends on the platform's qsort
and a lot of them are kinda pessimal for input like this.
8.2 (which uses our own qsort) seems to perform better in a quick
test.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-05-22 13:38:25 | Re: Index creation time and distribution |
Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-05-22 12:32:27 | Index creation time and distribution |