From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Giorgio Ponza" <giorgio(at)opla(dot)it> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Stupid question on INDEXES |
Date: | 2001-12-19 15:11:51 |
Message-ID: | 29521.1008774711@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
"Giorgio Ponza" <giorgio(at)opla(dot)it> writes:
> I'd like to know if i think in the right way. With
> CREATE TABLE Test1 (
> my_id int,
> descr text,
> primary key (my_id))
> Postgres automatically creates an index named test1_pkey.
> If i use
> CREATE TABLE Test1 (
> my_id int,
> descr text)
> without specifying a pkey, i can write
> create unique index i_test1_pkey on (my_id).
> The only difference is that in the 2nd case i can use the name i want, or
> the usage is different?
There are two things that are different:
1. PRIMARY KEY implies NOT NULL. You'd need to declare the column as
NOT NULL in the second CREATE TABLE to have exactly equivalent
constraints.
2. When a PRIMARY KEY is declared, the column(s) become the default
columns for a FOREIGN KEY declaration in another table, so you could
write "REFERENCES Test1" without having to mention my_id as the
referenced column. Without a PRIMARY KEY, you'll have to mention my_id
explicitly. But this is only a notational convenience.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-19 15:14:12 | Re: Query hangs when getting too complex... |
Previous Message | Troy.Campano | 2001-12-19 15:06:06 | Outputting select into file. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-12-19 17:16:45 | Re: Storing number '001' ? |
Previous Message | Giorgio Ponza | 2001-12-19 13:03:50 | Stupid question on INDEXES |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2001-12-19 16:11:28 | return a text agreggate from a subselect |
Previous Message | Giorgio Ponza | 2001-12-19 13:03:50 | Stupid question on INDEXES |