| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message) |
| Date: | 2022-01-12 06:37:05 |
| Message-ID: | 2951336.1641969425@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:19:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 2. You are attaching some random files, and would like to not
>> displace the cfbot's idea of the latest patchset.
> I'm assuming that someone wanting to send an additional patch to be applied on
> top of the OP patchset is part of 2?
AFAIK, if you're submitting a patch then you have to attach a complete
patchset, or the cfbot will be totally lost. Getting the bot to
understand incremental patches would be useful for sure ... but it's
outside the scope of what I'm asking for now, which is just clear
documentation of what the bot can do already.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-12 06:47:34 | Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-12 06:31:53 | Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message) |