From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IsTransactionState() is being used incorrectly |
Date: | 2007-07-17 01:56:58 |
Message-ID: | 29478.1184637418@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We could fix this either by changing the definition of
>> IsTransactionState() or by introducing another test function with
>> a different name. Any thoughts which is preferable?
> Is this done or should it be kept for 8.4?
Fixed, I thought ... yeah, here:
2007-06-07 17:45 tgl
* src/backend/: access/transam/xact.c, storage/ipc/procarray.c,
utils/error/elog.c: Redefine IsTransactionState() to only return
true for TRANS_INPROGRESS state, which is the only state in which
it's safe to initiate database queries. It turns out that all but
two of the callers thought that's what it meant; and the other two
were using it as a proxy for "will GetTopTransactionId() return a
nonzero XID"? Since it was in fact an unreliable guide to that,
make those two just invoke GetTopTransactionId() always, then deal
with a zero result if they get one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-07-17 02:45:46 | Re: [HACKERS] msvc, build and install with cygwin in the PATH |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-07-17 01:54:50 | Re: IsTransactionState() is being used incorrectly |