| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18536: Using WITH inside WITH RECURSIVE triggers a "shouldn't happen" error |
| Date: | 2024-07-14 17:30:55 |
| Message-ID: | 2946840.1720978255@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> Hmm, that is probably too strong: it will break some queries we've
> historically accepted. What we need is just to forbid self-references
> within the WITH clause. The code actually does that already, it's
> just doing it too late; so we can fix this with a simple re-ordering
> of the error checks, as attached.
Oh ...
regression=# WITH RECURSIVE x(n) AS (
select 0 union select 1 order by (select n from x)) select * from x;
ERROR: missing recursive reference
We have to move *all* of those subsidiary-clause checks to before
the tests of the UNION proper.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-fix-bug-18536.patch | text/x-diff | 5.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2024-07-15 08:28:26 | BUG #18540: Does PG16 standby database support function pg_replication_origin_advance? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-14 17:01:32 | Re: BUG #18536: Using WITH inside WITH RECURSIVE triggers a "shouldn't happen" error |