From: | Mathieu Arnold <mat(at)mat(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
Date: | 2004-04-14 16:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 2942923437.1081968736@andromede.faubourg.reaumur.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
+-le 05/04/2004 14:00 -0400, Dan Langille a dit :
| On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Jacob Hanson wrote:
|
|> http://www.oetrends.com/news.php?action=view_record&idnum=319
|>
|> Article discussing PHP5 says SQLite is "typically faster than MySQL,
|> significantly faster than PostgreSQL". While I don't doubt it's
|> faster at what it does (with it's small, focused feature-set), the
|> article perpuates the 'Postgres is slow' and 'MySQL is much faster
|> than Postgres' thinking that is no longer accurate.
|
| I can confirm that SQLite is faster than either MySQL or PostgreSQL when
| using Bacula. I'm working on improving the PostgreSQL.
On the Bacula side, I'm keeping sqlite because it's "one file", nothing to
restore beside that if (when) it (will) crashes.
--
Mathieu Arnold
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2004-04-14 19:17:03 | Analysis/Overview of PostgreSQL and SQL2003 |
Previous Message | Omar Miranda | 2004-04-14 15:03:31 | PostgreSQL CD based on Morphix |