Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2012-04-10 14:18:59
Message-ID: 29414.1334067539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Looking over the remaining patches that still aren't closed in the
> January CommitFest:
> [ all but ECPG readahead and maybe libpq URIs have to go to 9.3 ]

Yeah, I agree. I'm not comfortable with squeezing in the array foreign
keys stuff at this point, and the others are clearly not ready.

I put the buffer I/O timing units issue on the open-items list
yesterday:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Open_Items
and I encourage people to start using that to track must-fix-for-9.2
items.

We should at this point be focusing our efforts on getting a beta out.
Some but perhaps not all of the open items have to be resolved before
beta1, and we definitely need at least draft-quality release notes
so beta testers know what to test. Any other must-do tasks out there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2012-04-10 14:21:19 Re: disposition of remaining patches
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-04-10 14:15:37 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application