From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
Cc: | kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] avg() on numeric ? |
Date: | 1999-12-18 01:10:37 |
Message-ID: | 29406.945479437@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> Looks to me there's something wrong with the adjustment of
> actual computation and/or display precision during longer
> taking aggregates. I know where to look at - tnx anyway.
It doesn't necessarily take long; Zot O'Connor posted this example
in late October:
create table example(other decimal(4,4));
CREATE
insert into example (other) values(3.9);
ERROR: overflow on numeric ABS(value) >= 10^0 for field with precision 4 scale 4
insert into example (other) values(0.0);
ERROR: overflow on numeric ABS(value) >= 10^0 for field with precision 4 scale 4
which still fails in current sources.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 1999-12-18 03:56:13 | count() question |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-12-18 00:32:05 | Re: [SQL] Sub-select speed. |