From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Virender Singla <virender(dot)cse(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Aniket Jha <aniketkumarj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |
Date: | 2025-02-20 22:19:34 |
Message-ID: | 2939991.1740089974@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Hmm, I think fixing the bug as Tom suggests downthread is probably a
> good idea, but I think we should in addition change pg_dumpall to avoid
> printing a GRANT line if there's no grantee. Maybe turning one of these LEFT
> JOINs into a regular inner join is a sufficient fix for that:
After looking at this I thought it was worth a little more code to warn
about the dangling role OID, instead of just silently ignoring it.
Here's a couple of more-polished patches.
I'm unsure whether to back-patch the 0001 patch, as it does imply
more pg_shdepend entries than we have today, so it's sort of a
backdoor catalog change. But we're mostly interested in the
transient behavior of having a lock+recheck during entry insertion,
so maybe it's fine. 0002 should be back-patched in any case.
(BTW, I was distressed to learn from the code coverage report
that we have zero test coverage of the hardly-trivial logic in
dumpRoleMembership. I didn't try to address that here. I did
test this new logic by dint of manually deleting from pg_authid.)
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Avoid-race-condition-between-GRANT-role-and-DROP-.patch | text/x-diff | 7.5 KB |
v1-0002-Fix-pg_dumpall-to-cope-with-dangling-OIDs-in-pg_a.patch | text/x-diff | 5.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladlen Popolitov | 2025-02-21 04:57:54 | Re: Error in form on site commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Marlene Saransig | 2025-02-20 19:33:35 | Re: BUG #18821: Need delete files in pg_wal, size is bigger overcome limit max_wal_size |