| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: community decision-making & 8.5 |
| Date: | 2009-09-02 21:19:49 |
| Message-ID: | 29387.1251926389@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Anyway, I'm still curious about what'n'all -core actually does.
Not a lot. That's a feature, not a bug. Most project management
discussion happens on -hackers. If -hackers can't come to a decision
then core will try to resolve the deadlock (assuming we can agree ;-))
but we are well aware that we have a finite supply of authority,
and we try not to expend it unnecessarily.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-09-02 21:55:27 | Re: community decision-making & 8.5 |
| Previous Message | Олег Царев | 2009-09-02 21:19:25 | Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) |