From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Armin Schöffmann <armin(dot)schoeffmann(at)aegaeon(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue |
Date: | 2016-05-26 21:35:53 |
Message-ID: | 29376.1464298553@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ea274b2 has changed the way disconnection is done is is now closing
> both the read and write pipes. So you may want to retry if things get
> better with the next round of minor releases.
Hadn't paid attention to this thread before ...
It looks like there are still a few things we need to deal with before
considering Armin's submission resolved:
1. Armin proposes using "shutdown(pipeWrite, SD_BOTH)" where the code
committed this morning (df8d2d8c4) has "closesocket(pipeWrite)".
I'd prefer to leave it that way since it's the same as for the Unix case,
and Kyotaro-san says it works for him. Is there a reason we'd need
shutdown() instead?
2. Armin proposes that WaitForTerminatingWorkers needs to do CloseHandle()
on the various thread handles. That sounds plausible but I don't know
enough Windows programming to know if it really matters.
3. Should we replace ExitThread() with _endthreadex()? Again, it
seems plausible but I'm not the person to ask.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-05-26 22:24:16 | Re: Adding an alternate syntax for Phrase Search |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-05-26 20:18:43 | Re: pg_dump -j against standbys |