Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Armin Schöffmann <armin(dot)schoeffmann(at)aegaeon(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue
Date: 2016-05-26 21:35:53
Message-ID: 29376.1464298553@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ea274b2 has changed the way disconnection is done is is now closing
> both the read and write pipes. So you may want to retry if things get
> better with the next round of minor releases.

Hadn't paid attention to this thread before ...

It looks like there are still a few things we need to deal with before
considering Armin's submission resolved:

1. Armin proposes using "shutdown(pipeWrite, SD_BOTH)" where the code
committed this morning (df8d2d8c4) has "closesocket(pipeWrite)".
I'd prefer to leave it that way since it's the same as for the Unix case,
and Kyotaro-san says it works for him. Is there a reason we'd need
shutdown() instead?

2. Armin proposes that WaitForTerminatingWorkers needs to do CloseHandle()
on the various thread handles. That sounds plausible but I don't know
enough Windows programming to know if it really matters.

3. Should we replace ExitThread() with _endthreadex()? Again, it
seems plausible but I'm not the person to ask.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-05-26 22:24:16 Re: Adding an alternate syntax for Phrase Search
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-05-26 20:18:43 Re: pg_dump -j against standbys