From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrzej Rusin <Andrzej(dot)Rusin(at)interia(dot)pl> |
Subject: | Re: DEALLOCATE ALL |
Date: | 2007-03-27 17:49:39 |
Message-ID: | 29372.1175017779@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Marko Kreen wrote:
>> When pooling connections where prepared statements are in use,
>> it is hard to give new client totally clean connection as
>> there may be allocated statements that give errors when
>> new client starts preparing statements again.
> Huh, didn't we have a RESET SESSION command to do just that? What about
> cursors, for example?
We don't actually *have* one, but I believe it was agreed that that is
the right API to provide. If a pooler has to remember to clear prepared
statements, GUCs, cursors, and who knows what else, it'll be perpetually
broken because there'll be something it omits.
There might be a use-case for DEALLOCATE ALL, but needs of poolers
aren't it. I'd be inclined to vote against this unless someone can
point to a better use-case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2007-03-27 18:08:44 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 17:34:20 | Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum |