| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EXTRACT Clarification |
| Date: | 2004-09-29 15:32:24 |
| Message-ID: | 29367.1096471944@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
"Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> I'm thinking something like this (with thanks to Stephan):
> Note: EXTRACT is not a true function. SQL defines it as an expression
> that happens to look similar to a function call.
Rather than documenting this, maybe we should change the grammar to
allow it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-09-29 15:40:10 | Re: EXTRACT Clarification |
| Previous Message | Thomas F.O'Connell | 2004-09-29 13:34:11 | Re: EXTRACT Clarification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Villa | 2004-09-29 15:35:43 | Converting to Java date example |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-09-29 15:09:32 | Re: Setting search paths inside a function (plpgsql) |