Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
Date: 2008-01-03 07:14:49
Message-ID: 29362.1199344489@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I actually mean to say that DDLs can be declared as self-committing.

Egad, an Oracle lover in our midst.

Most of us think that roll-back-able DDL is one of the best features of
Postgres, and certainly one of our best selling points vis-a-vis Oracle.
Don't expect us to give it up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2008-01-03 07:38:47 Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
Previous Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2008-01-03 07:04:00 Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers