Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Date: 2007-12-27 06:10:29
Message-ID: 29359.1198735829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Guillaume Smet wrote:
>> beta RPMs are by default compiled with --enable-debug and
>> --enable-cassert which doesn't help them to fly fast...

> Got that right. Last time I was going crazy after running pgbench with
> those options and not having realized what I changed, I was getting a 50%
> slowdown on results that way compared to without the debugging stuff.
> Didn't realize it scaled with shared_buffers though.

See AtEOXact_Buffers(). There are probably any number of other
interesting scaling behaviors --- in my tests, AllocSetCheck() is
normally a major cycle-eater if --enable-cassert is set, and that costs
time proportional to the number of memory chunks allocated by the query.

Currently the docs say that --enable-cassert

Enables <firstterm>assertion</> checks in the server, which test for
many <quote>cannot happen</> conditions. This is invaluable for
code development purposes, but the tests slow things down a little.

Maybe we ought to put that more strongly --- s/a little/significantly/,
perhaps?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2007-12-27 07:16:38 Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2007-12-27 04:36:27 Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10