"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Yuck. This sucks :-( I was very much hoping we could avoid an other
> build *and* runtime dependency. Which will be a cascading runtime
> dependency to each and every program that uses libpq. double-:-(
That seems like a clear nonstarter :-(
Can we confine the damage to stuff that uses ecpg, rather than adding a
dependency to everything that uses libpq?
regards, tom lane