Re: gokiburi versus the back branches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gokiburi versus the back branches
Date: 2023-02-06 23:46:11
Message-ID: 2932406.1675727171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:27:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is it time to back-patch that commit?

> Yes, this is my intention as of this message from last week, once this
> week's release is tagged:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Y9sMhxo51HRXAmtu@paquier.xyz

D'oh, I'd totally forgotten that conversation already :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-02-06 23:46:12 Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-06 23:43:01 Re: pg_upgrade test failure