| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | demirgokhan(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Correction |
| Date: | 2017-11-19 21:17:59 |
| Message-ID: | 29321.1511126279@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
demirgokhan(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json.html
> Description:
> Shouldn't be below statement:
> "Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the
> @> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops."
> corrected to:
> "Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the ?
> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops."
Uh, no, I don't think so:
regression=# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname = 'jsonb_path_ops';
oid
------
4037
(1 row)
regression=# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily = 4037;
amopopr
-----------------
@>(jsonb,jsonb)
(1 row)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-20 16:39:36 | Migration to pglister - Before |
| Previous Message | demirgokhan | 2017-11-19 19:38:09 | Correction |