From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, marcelo Cortez <jmdc_marcelo(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)ar>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem? |
Date: | 2007-12-18 15:35:39 |
Message-ID: | 29305.1197992139@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:13:54AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html
> Ok, but that doesn't apply in this case, his database appears to be
> LATIN1 and this character is valid for that encoding...
You know what, I think the test in the code is backwards.
is_mb = pg_encoding_max_length(encoding) > 1;
if ((is_mb && (cvalue > 255)) || (!is_mb && (cvalue > 127)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("requested character too large for encoding: %d",
cvalue)));
Shouldn't we be allowing up-to-255 for single-byte encodings, not
multibyte?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-12-18 15:54:03 | Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-18 15:29:06 | Re: slony error --need help |