From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hitesh Bhambhani <hitesh(dot)bhambhani(at)asg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues |
Date: | 2010-08-05 20:29:26 |
Message-ID: | 29285.1281040166@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 05/08/10 21:28, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 05 14:01:15 -0400 2010:
>>> Maybe write-the-buffers-first is a sufficient longterm solution.
>>
>> Yeah, perhaps it is, though it's a pity that a single platform problem
>> is going to slow down everyone else.
> How about performing the truncate as usual, but if it fails, fill the
> truncated portion with zeros instead?
This is blithely assuming that you're going to be able to do anything at
all to the file after having failed to truncate it. The permissions
problem might be persistent, or you might crash, or several other
things. If we could do this safely, we could also do the original #3
solution (write the dirty buffers for the to-be-truncated block range
only after failing to truncate).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-05 20:31:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-08-05 20:08:36 | Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-05 20:31:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-08-05 20:08:36 | Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues |