Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?
Date: 2021-11-18 18:07:09
Message-ID: 2926803.1637258829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:24:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I think making a glossary entry that explains what the
>> process does would be a better plan than renaming it.

> Since d3014fff4:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/glossary.html#GLOSSARY-STARTUP-PROCESS

Hm ... I might've found that, if it were in alphabetical order ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-11-18 18:24:30 Re: make tuplestore helper function
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2021-11-18 17:59:03 Re: make tuplestore helper function