Re: Coding style for emacs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Coding style for emacs
Date: 2006-08-11 00:01:55
Message-ID: 2923.1155254515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I use more or less what is in the developers' FAQ (not surprising, since
> I contributed it). It works just fine for me. See
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html#item1.9

> We should probably bring the docs in line with that, unless someone with
> more emacs-fu than me has something to add.

I think it depends on which version of emacs you're using. The stuff in
the docs is pretty close to what I'm still using on emacs 19 (yeah, it's
old, but if it ain't broke...). It might be appropriate to list both
macros with a note about the version dependency.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-11 00:17:00 Re: Plugins redux (was Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-10 23:50:11 Rethinking top plan representation (or, Query vs. UPDATE RETURNING)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-11 00:17:00 Re: Plugins redux (was Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation
Previous Message korryd@enterprisedb.com 2006-08-10 23:03:10 Re: Plugins redux (was Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation