| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)deg(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Poor Performance on a table |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 19:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | 29227.1102016219@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)deg(dot)cc> writes:
> I have a table in my production database which has 500k rows and
> from the pg_class it shows the number of "relpages" of
> around 750K for this table, the same table copied to a test database
> shows "relpages" as 35k. I run vacuumdb on the whole
> database (not on the table individually but the whole database) daily.
You're obviously suffering serious table bloat :-(. Depending on how
heavy the update traffic on that table is, it might be that once-a-day
vacuum is simply not often enough. Another likely problem is that you
need to increase the FSM settings (how big is your whole database?)
> Is there any way to fix this problem ?
VACUUM FULL will fix the immediate problem. You might well find CLUSTER
to be a faster alternative, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank Wiles | 2004-12-02 19:38:09 | Re: Poor Performance on a table |
| Previous Message | Pallav Kalva | 2004-12-02 19:32:53 | Re: Poor Performance on a table |