| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-27 22:13:17 |
| Message-ID: | 29224.1064700797@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
>> internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose.
> True, but doing all that text manipulation is C is going to be very hard
> to do and maintain.
Text manipulation? I don't think that pg_upgrade has to do much text
manipulation. (The shell-script version might do so, but that's only
because it has to cast the problem in terms of program I/O.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-27 22:21:33 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-09-27 22:11:20 | Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2) |