Re: Bug list?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug list?
Date: 2000-07-09 17:57:40
Message-ID: 29217.963165460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is there an official bug list?

There's the TODO list, but things usually only get on there if they're
not going to be fixed quickly. Active discussion threads in pghackers
don't normally get reflected into TODO ...

> 1. Temp tables preventing permanent table creation:

Not a bug IMHO, since temp tables mask permanent tables. Drop
or rename the temp table if you want to make a permanent table.

> update t1 set f2=count(*) from t2 where t1.f1=2 and t2.f1=t1.f1 ;
> ERROR: ExecutePlan: (junk) `ctid' is NULL!

This is a bug, but it's not clear what the behavior should be; maybe
the bug is accepting an ill-defined command in the first place. See
"MAX() of 0 records" thread nearby.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Bug list? at 2000-07-09 12:26:38 from Philip Warner

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-09 18:35:40 Re: [SQL] MAX() of 0 records.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-09 17:38:52 Re: Unnexpected results using to_number()