Re: Out of memory with ODBC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: "Relyea, Mike" <Mike(dot)Relyea(at)xerox(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Out of memory with ODBC
Date: 2007-10-12 16:51:47
Message-ID: 29216.1192207907@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm - I can't think how that could reach 1.9GB in size, especially since
> it has to be something different between a "raw" connection and how ODBC
> is doing things.

Try turning on log_statement to see what's really being executed.
I seem to recall reading that Access thinks it can mangle your SQL
as it sees fit.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2007-10-12 16:59:42 Re: DB errors
Previous Message Erik Jones 2007-10-12 16:51:43 max_*, shared_buffers, and shared memory