From: | Artur Dabrowski <ad(at)astec(dot)com(dot)pl> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index |
Date: | 2010-07-20 07:37:16 |
Message-ID: | 29212162.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
The CentOS used for testing is a 64-bits version.
Artur Dabrowski wrote:
>
> I tested the same backup on our CentOS 5.4 virtual machine (running on xen
> server) and the results are really weird (118 rows, comparing to 116 on
> win xp and 123 expected):
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Incorrect-FTS-results-with-GIN-index-tp29172750p29212162.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Harald Fuchs | 2010-07-20 08:11:21 | Re: index scan and functions |
Previous Message | Artur Dabrowski | 2010-07-20 07:29:50 | Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-07-20 07:50:14 | Re: (9.1) btree_gist support for searching on "not equals" |
Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-07-20 07:37:12 | Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function |