Re: PITR Dead horse?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-03 23:35:46
Message-ID: 2919.1075851346@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com> writes:
> Has this been beaten to death now? Just curious if PITR was in Dev tree
> yet. Been out of the loop. TIA.

Nope... I've got some patches from Patrick Macdonald and JR Nield that I
need to integrate, but I believe those only cover some low-level changes
to the WAL log contents. There's a lot of management code yet to be
written.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-02-04 00:25:27 BgWriter sync option backed out
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-03 23:09:26 Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2004-02-04 01:59:52 Re: PITR Dead horse?
Previous Message Austin Gonyou 2004-02-03 20:17:38 PITR Dead horse?