| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
| Date: | 2005-05-19 05:37:29 |
| Message-ID: | 29172.1116481049@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> Say, how are you doing on that front?
> Current status is- it now compiles with a few pieces still missing:
> [snip]
It's essential IMHO that we provide pg_shadow and pg_group as reasonably
backward-compatible views on the new pg_roles catalog. It's not at all
negotiable that CREATE USER and CREATE GROUP have to still work in a
sane fashion --- to say otherwise is to say that we aren't going to load
pg_dumpall scripts from older PG versions, and that is a Non Starter.
(Not too many releases ago, we couldn't even say that: once upon a time
pg_dumpall tried to emit "COPY TO pg_shadow" commands :-(. But I hope
that it's no longer necessary to handle that ...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-05-19 06:12:07 | Re: could not dump unrecognized node type: 500 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-19 03:15:33 | Re: lastval() |