| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Karen Huddleston <khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types |
| Date: | 2017-06-15 13:20:35 |
| Message-ID: | 29134.1497532835@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
>> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
>> documentation?
> I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been
> deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone.
> Would be one less hack to maintain.
I thought about that too, but I think it's a bit late for v10.
Wouldn't object to doing it in the v11 cycle. In the meantime,
we'd need a fix for the back branches anyway.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anthony Sotolongo | 2017-06-15 15:01:27 | Re: Regarding copy of function from one db to another db |
| Previous Message | ruchitat | 2017-06-15 11:14:18 | BUG #14708: Frequent connection timeout issue while connecting to Postgres database |