From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Simplify formatting.c |
Date: | 2008-06-22 01:59:24 |
Message-ID: | 29109.1214099964@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd say not. Can't we do some more refactoring and avoid so many
>> useless conversions? Seems like str_initcap is the wrong primitive API
>> --- the work ought to be done by a function that takes a char pointer
>> and a length. That would be a suitable basis for functions operating
>> on both text datums and C strings.
> Yea, I thought about that idea too but it is going to add a strlen()
> calls in some places, but not in critical ones.
Sure, but the cost-per-byte of the strlen should be a good bit less than
the cost-per-byte of the actual conversion, so that doesn't bother me
too much.
Actually it seems like the hard part is not so much the input
representation as the output representation --- what should the
base-level initcap routine return, to be reasonably efficient for
both cases?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-22 02:43:28 | Re: Simplify formatting.c |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-22 01:49:33 | Re: Simplify formatting.c |