Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Date: 2004-08-24 06:00:10
Message-ID: 29107.1093327210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> According to the previous port report from Red Hat, the PS2 chip simply
>> doesn't have any user-space TAS instruction, so you're pretty much stuck.

> Out of curiosity. If it lacks a tas instruction, is there really any smp
> implementation that runs on it?

My recollection is that it has TAS capability but the designers made it
a privileged instruction (in a fit of brain death :-()

> Why would postgres want spinlocks at all with only one processor?

Think harder... one processor != one process...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2004-08-24 06:09:17 Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-24 05:55:25 Re: AT TIME ZONE