From: | "Stefano Dal Pra" <s(dot)dalpra(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Victor Nawothnig" <victor(dot)nawothnig(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle |
Date: | 2008-12-21 10:15:12 |
Message-ID: | 290a5abc0812210215v37422279t82ff705351870673@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
One year ago a Postgres teacher pointed me there:
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/database-soup/postgresql-publishes-first-real-benchmark-17470
http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070606-00065.html
that would be just like what you're looking for.
Regards,
Stefano
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Victor Nawothnig
<victor(dot)nawothnig(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for some recent and hopefully genuine comparisons between
> Oracle and PostgreSQL regarding their performance in large scale
> applications. Tests from real world applications would be preferable
> but not required. Also differentiations in different areas (i.e.
> different data types, query structures, clusters, hardware, etc.)
> might be helpful as well.
>
> I don't trust the results that Google gives me.
>
> Regards,
> Victor Nawothnig
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Carey | 2008-12-21 20:08:36 | Query planner plus partitions equals very bad plans, again |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2008-12-21 09:29:46 | Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5 |