| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Row-Level Security |
| Date: | 2009-12-14 15:04:55 |
| Message-ID: | 29092.1260803095@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> One more issue I found.
> What row-level policy should be applied on inherited tables?
Yup, that seems like an interesting problem.
> Even if the inherited table has multiple parents, all the row-level
> policies shall be applied, so here is no inconsistency.
> (Needless to say, child table have same columns, so we can apply
> same row-level policies.)
I don't think I believe either of those statements.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-14 15:05:09 | Re: WAL Info messages |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-12-14 15:04:11 | Re: pgAdmin III: timestamp displayed in what time zone? |