From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
Date: | 2010-02-21 22:16:54 |
Message-ID: | 29091.1266790614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Attached is a draft patch (no doc changes) that implements CREATE OR
>> REPLACE LANGUAGE
> How is pg_migrator affected by this? It always loads the the dump as
> the super-user. How will the pg_dump use CREATE OR REPLACE LANGUAGE?
pg_dump would issue "CREATE OR REPLACE LANGUAGE plpgsql" which would
succeed just fine, since it'd be issued by a superuser.
I think the potential downsides of that are significantly smaller than
having a special case that excludes plpgsql altogether --- for one
example, it would still succeed in a custom installation that had been
changed so that plpgsql wasn't installed by default.
BTW, another problem I just noticed with the current kluge is that it
fails to transfer any nondefault permissions that might have been
attached to plpgsql.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-02-21 23:43:26 | Re: pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-21 22:11:16 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |