Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> writes:
> It has a unique index on virtual_domain. Every day we do <10000 queries
> of the form
> insert into virtual_domains values (default, 'www.something.de')
So you're expecting these inserts to fail because of unique index
violations?
> The big table size slows down sequential scans significantly. What can
> we do to prevent growth of the table?
Vacuum more often. You have to get rid of the tuples that failed the
index check. They are already in the table when the index spits up.
regards, tom lane