| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore |
| Date: | 2003-09-17 04:16:48 |
| Message-ID: | 29050.1063772208@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> Not so sure on whether the foot gun is a good idea. We already have .22
> calibre foot gun (fsync) that makes for pretty big improvements in load
> speed, and we see people all the time on General and Performance running
> production servers with it turned off. You know as well as I do the
> second we make WAL optional, some people are gonna start running
> production servers with it.
Well, yeah, they will. On a noncritical server, is that a sin? I mean,
if we offer fsync-off, it's not clear to me that offering WAL-off makes
the difference between venial and mortal sin. Seems to me we're just
putting the weapons in the display case. fsync = .22, WAL = .45,
but you shoot your foot with either one it's still gonna ruin your day.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-17 04:26:05 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Previous Message | Robert Creager | 2003-09-17 03:35:03 | Re: State of Beta 2 |