Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
Date: 2006-02-09 18:13:17
Message-ID: 2904.1139508797@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> Again, regardless of OS used, hashagg will exceed "working memory" as
> defined in postgresql.conf.

So? If you've got OOM kill enabled, it can zap a process whether it's
strictly adhered to work_mem or not. The OOM killer is entirely capable
of choosing a victim process whose memory footprint hasn't changed
materially since it started (eg, the postmaster).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rodrigo Hjort 2006-02-09 18:16:51 Server Programming in C: palloc() and pfree()
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-02-09 18:12:58 Re: Upcoming re-releases