| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
| Cc: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev), pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Delaying insertion of default values |
| Date: | 1999-07-08 14:44:09 |
| Message-ID: | 29032.931445049@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>>>> rule mechanism. Unless I hear objections, I will do that while I am
>>>> cleaning up INSERT processing for the INSERT ... SELECT ... GROUP BY bug.
>>
>> No objections -:).
> This would be obsolete when having the above recompilation
> implemented.
I plan to do it anyway, since I need to restructure analyze.c's handling
of INSERT and I believe that it would be cleaner to do the
default-adding work in expand_targetlist. But recompiling rules is
needed to solve other problems, so that has to happen too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-07-08 14:44:39 | [Fwd: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql 6.5-1 rpms on RedHat 6.0] |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-08 14:40:45 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h |