Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11
Date: 2020-01-29 18:22:31
Message-ID: 29032.1580322151@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> We have recently upgraded postgres from 9.2 to 11.6 and started seeing
> performance issue immediately and able to fix the performance issue after
> disabling parameter: enable_seqscan.
> Question :
> Should i keep the above parameter always disabled ? If not why the behavior
> changed in Higher version ?

This is unanswerable with the amount of information you've given.
Yes, turning off enable_seqscan is a bad idea in general, but why
you got a worse plan without that requires details.

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2020-01-29 18:32:09 Re: Exclude constraint on ranges : commutative containment : allow only complete containment
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-01-29 18:20:36 Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11