Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: richt(at)multera(dot)com
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Date: 2002-08-02 23:49:07
Message-ID: 29010.1028332147@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Richard Tucker <richt(at)multera(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Issue an ALTER SYSTEM BEGIN BACKUP command which turns on atomic write,
> checkpoints the database and disables further checkpoints (so wal files
> won't be reused) until the backup is complete.
> 2) Change ALTER SYSTEM BACKUP DATABASE TO <directory> read the database
> directory to find which files it should backup rather than pg_class and for
> each file just use system(cp...) to copy it to the backup directory.
> 3) ALTER SYSTEM FINISH BACKUP does at it does now and backs up the pg_xlog
> directory and renables database checkpointing.

> Does this sound right?

I really dislike the notion of turning off checkpointing. What if the
backup process dies or gets stuck (eg, it's waiting for some operator to
change a tape, but the operator has gone to lunch)? IMHO, backup
systems that depend on breaking the system's normal operational behavior
are broken. It should be sufficient to force a checkpoint when you
start and when you're done --- altering normal operation in between is
a bad design.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2002-08-02 23:50:31 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2002-08-02 23:42:57 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations