| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2024-11-21 05:13:10 |
| Message-ID: | 28e887b58c2e8b89f2753e6b11079e63d27ce613.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2024-11-20 at 22:54 +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 20/11/2024 22:22, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 08:30, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > > OK, I'm fine with this. v4 patch attached with one plan showing read, written, and dirtied buffers.
> > I think this might be a good time for anyone out there who is against
> > turning on BUFFERS when ANALYZE is on to speak up.
> >
> > Votes for changing this so far seem to be: Me, Michael Christofides,
> > Guillaume Lelarge, Robert, Greg Sabino Mullane, and David Fetter (from
> > 2020) [1].
>
> Add me to the pro list, please.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3197ba8-225f-f53c-326d-5b1756c77c3e@postgresfriends.org
Me, too!
https://postgr.es/m/790e175d16cca11244907d3366a6fa376c33e882.camel@cybertec.at
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2024-11-21 05:43:45 | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-11-21 05:06:32 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |